Yet another person realizes that liberal democracy is broken.

7 posts

niccolo and donkey Roland

This is a good summary of our current predicament, from some blogger who was linked at another site:

The last paragraph is good.

I haven't read any other entries on this guy's blog yet, but I get the sense he's some sort of lefty. It's funny how much of his analysis could've been written by someone on our side as well.
Team Zissou
This lasts only so long as the government has the money to keep buying complacency. So far we've deferred paying the piper by running the debt through extruded secondary markets.

Would love to know who the senior SNP Minister referred to is. Could probably work it out with a bit of effort which I can't be fucked putting in now.


In the states at least, a major contributing factor to this whole contretemps is that senators are elected, ostensibly by the people, instead of being appointed by their state legislatures as it was prior to the passage of the 17th amendment.

As a result, they need only concern themselves with party line politics and the popular national issues of the day instead of the issues of their states -- in fact, they absolutely must do so in order to be nominated, much less elected.


Related to my point above -- yeah, it's HuffPo, but still a good article.

A group of Republican state lawmakers in Georgia wants to end direct election of United States senators and return the power to state legislatures.

The resolution calls on Congress to begin the process of repealing the 17th Amendment, passed in 1913, which provided for the direct election of senators. State Rep. Kevin Cooke (R-Carrollton), the main sponsor of the resolution, told the Douglas County Sentinel that moving the power back to state legislatures would allow for the original intent of the Constitution.

“It’s a way we would again have our voice heard in the federal government, a way that doesn’t exist now,” Cooke told the paper . “This isn’t an idea of mine. This was what James Madison was writing. This would be a restoration of the Constitution, about how government is supposed to work.”

In the text of the resolution , Cooke cites Madison's writing in the Federalist Papers, specifying that members of the Senate would be "elected absolutely and exclusively by state legislatures."

The resolution says the 17th Amendment has prevented state governments from having a say in federal government and that repealing the amendment would hold U.S. senators accountable to the states. The federal government has grown in "size and scope," it says, in the century since the amendment was adopted.

The 17th Amendment was adopted out of concern for state-level corruption influencing Senate elections, which Cooke said would not be the case now.

“It’s the responsibility of each and every citizen to make sure of who gets elected to office, that they’re principled people,” Cooke told the Douglas County Sentinel . “You can look at the current state of ethics and transparency. Anybody has the ability to look at money being donated to campaigns. It would keep anything from being done out of the public eye.”

Changing the 17th Amendment has been a favorite cause of libertarians in recent years. During his race last year, Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) called for the repeal of the 17th Amendment. New Hampshire lawmakers voted last year against a bill that would allow for the state legislature to choose who would be allowed to run for Senate seats. A similar bill is currently pending in the Tennessee Legislature.

Former New Hampshire state Rep. Bob Kingsbury (R-Laconia) told The Huffington Post in 2012 that his bill would allow a return to the Constitution's "original intent" while Tennessee state Sen. Frank Niceley (R-Strawberry Plains) told that it was "time to try something different."

Niccolo and Donkey
Up here in Canada senators are still directly appointed, and it's done by the PMO (Prime Minister's Office) with little input from his backbenchers.
They senators have no constituents. It's one less reason to not do their jobs.