West blinks at Wahhabism's dark side

4 posts

Niccolo and Donkey
West blinks at Wahhabism's dark side

Asia Times Online

Zubair Khan

O ctober 12, 2012

In Saudi Arabia there is no church, synagogue, Buddhist nor Hindu temple allowed. Wahhabism (pseudo Salafism) is not a religion of tolerance. Wahhabism provides the fundamental base for jihadism which causes unending strife and misery.

It is not Iran that should be bombed. In Iran there are still Jews living there and praying in their synagogues. Muammar al-Gaddafi respected Christian and Jewish religions and their churches, synagogues in Libya but American, English, French, Saudi and

[​IMG] Qatari-financed terrorists have destroyed churches and synagogues recently. Buddhist temples including Bamiyan Buddha statues have survived in Islamic countries for centuries, but they would not survive under the Wahhabism.

Washington and London are protecting Wahhabi extremists. In Syria, Christians and their churches were safe before the Westerners began sending their Wahhabi fanatics to kill innocent Syrian civilians.

In Bosnia and Kosovo, under the guise of "reconstruction aid", Saudi Arabia, Kuwaiti, and other Wahhabi organizations have demolished and removed major Islamic monuments which survived attacks by Serb and Croat militias. These were created by Muslims with an Islamic culture and tradition stretching back to 14th century, long before Ibn Abd al-Wahhab made his 18th century alliance with the warlord Ibn Saud who founded the Saudi dynasty - the House of Saud.

The Wahhabis, and the British, supported the warlord Ibn Saud and legitimized the Saudi dynasty and its struggle against the Uthman Khillafath of Turkey. Since then the House of Saud always supports Britain and its allies, including the US and Israel. When the House of Saud took control of the Holy Places in Arabia from the Uthman Khillafath of Turkey with British support, 15 centuries of Islamic heritage was destroyed, including the desecration of the tombs of the wives and companions of the Holy Prophet, in the iconoclastic imposition of Wahhabism. The iconoclastic Wahhabi House of Saud gradually destroyed several holy shrines, including historical places of Islam from the Prophet's house in Mecca and companion Ayoob Ansari's house in Medina and turned them into apartments blocks and hotels. They also turned the site of the Prophet's wives' houses into a parking lot.

The Wahhabi-backed House of Saud took full control of the Hijaz, Mecca and Medina, in 1924 and established the modern state of Saudi Arabia, with Wahhabism as its official religion. Since then the House of Saud has promoted Wahhabism as normative Islam throughout the Islamic world. The House of Saud was consolidated on massive oil wealth and has spent huge sums of money building Wahhabi mosques, publishing Wahhabi literature and funding Wahhabi organizations world-wide. Today, with Wahhabi control of the Holy Places intact, virtually every aspect and corner of modern Islam has been penetrated by Wahhabi influence through the agency of the House of Saud.

Through the control of the Hajj - the beating heart of Islam - and through their vigorous publication and propaganda means, the Saudis have ensured that almost all Muslims are infected with Wahhabism to some extent.

Present Zionist and Wahhabi doctrines foresee the fall of Iran, Belarus, and, ultimately Russia and China, after the fall of Damascus, to the combined forces of NATO and the Saudi- and Qatari-backed Wahhabis, who make up a large portion of the anti-Syrian movement.

Sufism is an entirely indigenous Islamic movement resistant to fundamentalism. Throughout South Asia, including Sri Lanka for several centuries, the spiritual tradition of Sufism has been vigorously present. Across Pakistan, the religious tenor has been correspondingly radicalized: the tolerant, Sufi-minded Barelvi form of Islam is now overtaken by the rise of the more hardline and politicized Wahhabism. Remember Sri Lankan cricketers were ambushed in Lahore by armed Wahhabi jihadists.

Wahhabi ideology of Islam reached Sri Lanka in the 1940s, but was not accepted by Sri Lankan Muslims. Later, oil-rich Saudi Arabia greatly began to penetrate Sri Lanka's adherents to Islam in 1970s.

With funding from Saudi Arabia's petro dollars, Wahhabi followers are now responsible for the sectarian clashes that are slowly increasing among Sri Lankan Muslims especially in the Eastern Province. It is sadly true but there is a rising trend of Wahhabi jihadism in Sri Lanka.

Wahhabis are trying to take the peaceful Islamic community in Sri Lanka down the path of extremism and violence. Wahhabi fundamentalism has advanced so quickly in Sri Lanka partly because the House of Saud has financed the building of so many madrassas.

The Wahhabis have already created deep divisions in among Sri Lankan Muslims and have formed gangs to intimidate moderate Muslims who speak out against Wahhabi fanatics. Like the Christian fundamentalist groups using NGOs to convert innocent poor families to Christianity, Wahhabis help poor Muslim families by providing cash and other material benefits to convert them into their cult. By building churches and madrassas all over the world to harvest the poor souls is truly very clever idea. Wahhabis even use Sri Lankan Government Cultural and Religious Affairs Departments to continue their nefarious activities.

Wahhabis claim that moderate Sri Lankan Muslims do not know anything of Islam and only themselves are the real scholars of Islam. But Wahhabis preach only a dawah of hatred, terror and murder. To understand the deranged mentality of Wahhabis look at the fitna the Wahhabis have caused in Pakistan.

The authorities must investigate every Wahhabi school and propagandist in the eastern province to make sure they are not preaching things that are inimical to Sri Lanka. Saudi Arabia remains a critical financial support base for al-Qaeda, Taliban, Lashkar-e-Taiba and other Wahhabi terrorist groups. Saudi Arabia spends $87 billion per year to spread Wahhabism world-wide. Scholarships are offered to our Muslims youths to go to Wahhabi institutions in Saudi Arabia and Egypt. But those who completed their Wahhabi studies return to Sri Lanka and propagate Wahhabism.

The CIA introduced Wahhabism in Sri Lanka through Saudi Arabia as a means of countering the growing support for Iran and Sufism among the Sri Lankan Muslims since the CIA had calculated that Wahhabism would be an effective rival theology to prevent the spread of Iranian influence in Sri Lanka.

Clashes between Sufis and Wahhabi Muslims in Kattankudi and in Oddamavadi occured on a regular basis due to the conflict of beliefs between both religious theologies. In October 2004 similar clashes occurred in Kattankudi and more than 200 homes of Sufi followers were burnt down by Wahhabi Jihadists.

One of the local Sufi leaders, Abdul Payilvan, died in Colombo was buried at in Kattankudi the next day. Wahhabi Muslims observed a hartal and demanded the removal of the body from the burial grounds. Wahhabi Muslims claim Kattankudy soil is sacred and bodies belonging to those who preach views contradictory to Wahhabism should not be buried there. Wahhabis have demanded that the body of l Payilvan, who is from Maruthamunai in the Ampara district, should be exhumed and buried elsewhere.

Wahhabis dug up the buried body of another Sufi Muslim from Mosque burial grounds and dumped the body on a local road as an act of protest. Kattankudi Police recovered the body, re-buried it in the original burial ground and guarded burial ground for few days.

In Kattankudi, the hatred between Wahhabis and Sufis has widened in the last few years and has grown in intensity, left many injured, and caused damage to several houses and vehicles.

A more recent 2009 clash in the south-western Muslim coastal town of Beruwala reflects similar religious tensions between a popular Sufi sheikh and a nearby Wahhabi congregation.

Saudi agents have successfully penetrated Sri Lankan Muslims social fabric and have managed to defeat the Sufism at their own game. Due to the training afforded by the House of Saud now the Wahhabis have prevailed over the Sufis. The Muslims in Sri Lanka have been subdued due to the Wahhabi influence while Buddhists have been agitating for the release of Rizana Naffek - a teenage housemaid from Muthur who was sentenced to death by a Wahhabi Sharia Court in Saudi Arabia.

The House of Saud, pretending to be the leaders of the Islam, promote their Wahhabi ideology world-wide. The result has been the birth of al-Qaeda, the Taliban, Lashkar-e-Taiba and other Wahhabi terrorist groups which are killing Sunni and Shi'ite Muslims alike in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Wahhabism has been taking roots in Maldives from the days of Maumoon Abdul Gayoom. Abandoning its tolerant, syncretic brand of Islam, Maldives now moves towards an intolerant Wahhabi society.

Al-Qaeda, Taliban, Lashkar-e-Taiba are overseen by the CIA and Mossad who want to destabilise countries that are not friendly to them. Because the House of Saud depends on the Americans for its security it always obeys American orders. The constant demonization of Iran and now the war against Syrian leader Bashar Al-Assad confirms a perception that Western Countries have joined with the Wahhabis in the Wahhabis' war on the Shia. Wahhabi jihadism remains a long-term security risk to the civilized world. In particular, through the spread of Wahhabi education in tens of thousands of religious schools world-wide, the practitioners of Wahhabism are breeding tens of millions of youth who are certain to remain outside the productive economy, and as a consequence, seethe with resentment and anger against the rest of society.

Even the forced exodus of the Hindu Pandit community from the Kashmir Valley in India during the early 1990s, and the destruction of several Hindu and Sikh temples by the Wahhabi Jihadists in Kashmir, failed to slow down the volume of laudatory coverage of what were portrayed Wahhabi Jihadists as freedom fighters battling cruel Indian Army in Jammu and Kashmir State by the Western media. The "Kashmir Model" of using the language of democracy and human rights to win Western support, even while adhering to a contrary policy in practice was widely used to topple Libyan leader Muammar al-Gaddafi. Wahhabis hated Muammar al-Gaddafi for the fact that he ruled Libya, with no quarter given to Wahhabi demands as the imposition of Sharia law or the banning of women's dress other than the abaya.

After Muammar al-Gaddafi was defeated and killed, Wahhabi Jihadists who took over Libya as a result of huge help from Nicholas Sarkozy and David Cameron have lost no time in imposing a Wahhabi version of Sharia law in Libya and in killing and jailing those who disagree with their extremist world-view. Fortunately for them, Western media channels that were once filled with news about Libya under Muammar Gaddafi are now silent about the immense human rights violations taking place in Libya after its "liberation" in 2011.

Seeing the success of such a pitch in Libya, Wahhabi jihadists against the Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad, have begun cultivating the Western media and public opinion, the way the Wahhabi Jihadists in Kashmir used to do in the 1990s.

So extreme has the identification with such elements become, that even the largest Western media outlets accept without question such "facts" as that Syrian president bombed his own troops and facilities in order "to blame it on the insurgents". Since the armed uprising by Wahhabi jihadists began in Syria, several thousand members of the Syrian security forces and their family members have been killed by the Wahhabi insurgents, who themselves have lost thousands of their own.

However, those relying on Western media are told that every such death has been caused by the Syrian security forces, ignoring the deadly violence that is being unleashed in Syria by groups of armed Wahhabi mobs.

Today in Syria, women can dress as they please. Were the Wahhabi jihadists to take control, this freedom might soon be replaced with the obligation to wear the full veil. Already in Egypt and in Tunisia, the secular ethos of the country is rapidly giving way to Wahhabism.

While Western countries are opposed to Wahhabi jihadism and Sharia law in their own countries, in the Arab countries they favor Wahhabi jihadism over those who are secular. The result is a galloping Wahhabism and its Sharia law across the Arab countries.

Since the Western countries' subterfuge to destabilize Sri Lanka by surreptitiously supporting the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) failed, now the Western countries will promote Wahhabi jihadism to cause strife and trouble there.

Wahhabi followers - al-Qaeda, Taliban, Lashkar-e-TaibaTaliban and other Wahhabi terror groups - have caused untold misery in several countries including Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and India. Sri Lanka appears to be their next target.

The Sri Lankan government must take immediate strict measures to control Wahhabi organizations and ban them.
Niccolo and Donkey
Angocachi SteamshipTime Thomas777 Byssus SweetLeftFoot President Camacho Roland

Add a comment

  • [​IMG]
    Muzahir Syed · Head of Equality and Diversity Services at Retired
    My name is not a fake and I support the views expressed by Zubair Khan. I have observed the atrocities committed by Wahhabi doctrine in the name of Islam. I despise the Saudis attempt to divide Muslims by sowing the seeds of sectarianism in order to avoid having to give their citizens their rights.

    The end of Saudi regime in Hijaz will bring peace to the Islamic world and encourage coexistence in peace with the non Islamic world. May Allah bring this day in my life time.
    Reply · 6 · Like · Follow Post · October 11 at 8:30am
    • P N Eswaran (signed in using Hotmail)
      The end of Saudi regime in Hijaz will bring in Al-qaeda and not anything better. Wahhabism perhaps attracts most Muslims because it is close to "true Islam". Some "liberal" Muslims of other sects blame Wahhabism for the intolerance in Islamic societies but the fact is Islam is intrinsically intolerant of which Wahhabism is one of its expressions.
      Reply · 2 · Like · October 11 at 10:42am
    • [​IMG]
      Shah Hussain Madni · Madina, Punjab, Pakistan
      Reply · 2 · Like · October 11 at 4:00pm
    • [​IMG]
      Abu Ayman · Top Commenter · Chennai, Tamil Nadu
      you didnt author the article so there is no need for you to be defensive about your being who you claim about who you are, but you are confusing between extremist wahabis and saudi regime, they both are not the one and the same, saudi regimes use wahabi ulemas who tow their line and united snakes to stick on to power, where as wahabi ulema who oppose the regime are behind bars in saudi. i am no fan of saudi regime but you have to look at the bigger picture, the godless- secularists and the disbelievers are plotting to divide the ummah of Muhammed sal Allaahu alayhi wa sallam on basis of langugae, culture, sectarian affliations, and manmade political ideologies such as bathists, secularists,democrats etc. thie aim is to oppose Allaah's law from being established in a khlilafah. i hope muslims wake up sooner rather than later for their own good
      Reply · 1 · Like · October 11 at 9:35pm
    View 7 more
  • [​IMG]
    Abu Ayman · Top Commenter · Chennai, Tamil Nadu
    I feel this writers name is a fake and its a non muslim hiding behind it or worse the writer is an utter ignorant and a hypocrite who thinks he is a muslim. islam is about God's Message to mankind through His Messenger Muhammed,, who conveyed that none is worthy of worship but God (Allaah in arabic). this ignorant tries to spew hate against islam and muslims and split muslims in sectarian basis, all the while when all muslims are united upon their aborance or disbelief and idol worship and cross worship. this writer needs to educate himself about islam before writing about islam and muslims.
    Reply · 4 · Like · Follow Post · October 11 at 4:49am
    • [​IMG]
      Uni Crane · Islam is the way of life
      Agree with your comment. The writer seems not to be a Muslim, or probably a nominal one with no idea what the Quran and Ahadith are actually teaching. For Muslims that have studied Islam based on the Quran and the authentic Sunnah according to the understanding and practices of the Salaf, the writer's ignorance is absolutely clear. Sadly, he has managed to disrepute Asia Times Online as well for publishing such a writing. It is very clear that AToL only agreed to upload this because it agrees with the writer's clear hatred of a group of whom he has absolutely no idea what they stand for from an Islamic perspective, and not because it has any academic or intelligent value or the like at all.
      Reply · 2 · Like · October 11 at 6:50pm
  • Serkan Naim (signed in using Hotmail)
    I take it the writer is a sufi? fact of the matter is there is no such thing as wahhabism to say there is would be to claim Abdul wahab came up with new ideas he was merely following what the prophet pbuh and the sahaba did. If muhammed PBUH was here this writer would call the prophet and his companions wahhabis.
    Reply · 2 · Like · Follow Post · October 11 at 11:52am
Niccolo and Donkey

Saudi clerics forbid Saudi citizens in 2005 from going on Jihad in Iraq and Afghanistan. Now the Monarch doesn't want Saudis in Syria.

The Saudi monarchy is not Salafi, but reformist and anti-jihadist. The Mosques it funds do not spread Salafism, but watered down garbage meant to combat Salafism. Saud imprisons genuine Salafis and Jihadists.

NATO and the GCC back insurgencies and revolts in Muslims countries, but not Salafi Jihadists. The entire struggle in Libya and Syria today, for NATO and Saud, is keeping Al Qaeda, Al Nusra and other Shariah-bound guerrillas from seizing the reigns from secularist opposition composed of former exiles.

There is no Obama and Saud colluding to arm and fund Jihadists. That's nuts. I understand that you're rooting for Shia because Tehran and Assad have a lot of contracts with Putin, but don't ever be retarded enough to think the US or Saud support Salafi Jihadists or ever have.