Navy's new gender-neutral carriers won't have urinals

3 posts

Navy's new gender-neutral carriers won't have urinals


July 11, 2012

The U.S. Navy's new class of carriers will be the first to go without urinals, a decision made in part to give the service flexibility in accommodating female sailors, the Navy says.
The change heralded by the Gerald R. Ford class of carriers starting with the namesake carrier due in late 2015 is one of a number of new features meant to improve sailors' quality of life and reduce maintenance costs, Capt. Chris Meyer said Wednesday.
Omitting urinals lets the Navy easily switch the designation of any restroom or head, in naval parlance from male to female, or vice versa, helping the ship adapt to changing crew compositions over time, Meyer said.
The Navy could designate a urinal-fitted area to women, of course, but the urinals would be a waste of space. Making the areas more gender-neutral is a relatively new consideration for the service, with most of its current carriers commissioned before it began deploying women on combat ships in 1994 .
But it wasn't the only reason for the move.
Urinal drain pipes clog more than toilets and therefore can be smellier and costlier to maintain, Meyer said.
"There's a lot more at play in the design objectives than (making the toilet areas) gender-neutral. We're saving money in maintenance costs, and we’re improving quality of life," said Meyer, manager of the Future Aircraft Carriers Program for the Naval Sea Systems Command.
Other quality-of-life updates, according to Meyer:
Sleeping areas, or berthings, generally will be smaller, designed for fewer people per room. On current
carriers, some berthings have more than 100 sailors each. On the Ford carriers, the number will be closer to 30 to 50 each.
Heads will be attached to berthing compartments. Currently, many sailors have to traverse a passageway between a berthing and a head, meaning sailors who’ve just woken up have to dress up more for a trip to the head than they would if it were adjacent.
The new Ford-class features were first reported by the Navy Times .
Some sailors said that they're happy to lose the urinals because they're hard to clean and maintain, the Navy Times reported this week.
The Ford class is the future replacement for the Nimitz class. The Ford carriers are designed to allow more aircraft sorties , but with about 660 fewer crew members, according to the Navy.
The first three Ford carriers are scheduled to debut between 2015 and 2027, at a total projected cost of $37 billion. That cost includes non-recurring engineering expenses and research and development costs for the first carrier, the Navy says.
Bob Dylan Roof

I suppose there could be a politically neutral managerial reason for doing away with urinals, but we all know that isn't the case.

The overwhelming technological superiority of the United States is the only reason the bulk of the U.S. Military can survive a transition from a formidable fighting force to a boarding school for deviants. The main purpose of some of the branches seems to be curbing unemployment numbers.

President Camacho
That certainly seems to be the case at least for the 2 biggest branches-- the Army and the Navy. In the Army you have a handful of elite infantry units, plus the airborne divisions and Delta Force/Rangers, and of coruse the Special Forces. I'd imagine that these units make up less than 10% of the Army's overall manpower.

Same thing with the Navy-- the crews on nuclear submarines are still going to be handpicked for toughness and nerves of steel, but 95% of the surface fleet personnel are just miscreants of various types.

Even the Marines are becoming slowly "Army-fied", and the Air Force, with its joystick-wielding cosplay crews replacing actual fighter pilots, are not immune to the tide of faggotry.